The powerpoint presentation made by the architects at the January 13th SBC meeting is now available online in pdf format. Please note the file is large and takes awhile to download. It can be accessed by clicking on the link called "SMMA Community Presentations" at the right of this page, or by copying and pasting the following link into your browser:
http://www.aps1.net/archives/47/AndoverBancroft_SchoolCommitteeCommunityMeeting_13JAN2010.pdf
Friday, January 15, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Agenda for January 13th SBC Meeting and Draft Traffic Study Scope
Below, a link to the agenda for the January 13th SBC Meeting, to be held at 6:00 pm in the School Committee Room, 36R Bartlet Street, 2nd floor above the Senior Center. Please note that the traffic consultant will arrive at 7:00 pm, so we will not discuss the traffic study prior to that time. (You will need to copy and paste the link into your browser)
http://www.aps1.net/archives/42/School%20Building%20Committee%201.13.10.pdf
In addition, a draft copy of the scope of the traffic study can be viewed by following the link below:
http://ma-andoverpublicschools.epoweredschools.com/DocumentView.aspx?DID=1015
http://www.aps1.net/archives/42/School%20Building%20Committee%201.13.10.pdf
In addition, a draft copy of the scope of the traffic study can be viewed by following the link below:
http://ma-andoverpublicschools.epoweredschools.com/DocumentView.aspx?DID=1015
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Update from January 6th SBC Meeting
At its January 6th meeting, the School Building Committee discussed the geotechnical analysis that is currently being conducted by McArdle, Gannon Associates as part of the Feasibility Study. The objective of the geotechnical analysis is to explore subsurface conditions within the potential areas of development on the site to provide information on what kind of building foundations, construction slabs, and access route support may be needed in the scope of the building project. The results of this analysis will be available by early February. Please note that the architects said the results of the geotechnical study are unlikely to affect any decision on where the new school should be located on the site or where the access routes should be; they will simply provide information about what kind of foundation will be needed, what kinds of slabs will be necessary for construction purposes, etc.
A geo-environmental analyst will also be on site during this process to assess whether there are any hazardous chemicals present in the soil.
In addition, the team from Symmes, Maini, & McKee presented a draft matrix for the SBC to use in evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each of the potential building site and design alternatives (front of existing building, rear of existing building, and current footprint). The matrix is broken down into a number of different evaluation categories, with various considerations listed under each category. This matrix is a draft and SBC members are currently working on proposing revisions to it in conjunction with SMMA.
Finally, SMMA showed some additional draft site concepts for the new school. One concept showed a footprint for the new school being built on top of the existing footprint. The others presented were 3-story versions of the 2-story footprints that were shown at the December 23rd meeting. All draft site concepts will be made available online for the community to review, hopefully by tomorrow (Monday, January 11th). As soon as they are available, I will post that information here.
A geo-environmental analyst will also be on site during this process to assess whether there are any hazardous chemicals present in the soil.
In addition, the team from Symmes, Maini, & McKee presented a draft matrix for the SBC to use in evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each of the potential building site and design alternatives (front of existing building, rear of existing building, and current footprint). The matrix is broken down into a number of different evaluation categories, with various considerations listed under each category. This matrix is a draft and SBC members are currently working on proposing revisions to it in conjunction with SMMA.
Finally, SMMA showed some additional draft site concepts for the new school. One concept showed a footprint for the new school being built on top of the existing footprint. The others presented were 3-story versions of the 2-story footprints that were shown at the December 23rd meeting. All draft site concepts will be made available online for the community to review, hopefully by tomorrow (Monday, January 11th). As soon as they are available, I will post that information here.
Monday, January 4, 2010
Update and Upcoming School Building Committee Meetings
On December 23rd, the School Building Committee met with architects from Symmes, Maini, & McKee, as well as with Todd Brayton, a traffic consultant from Bryant Associates, to discuss the scope of the traffic analysis. Also in attendance were Lieutenant Todd Pomerleau of the Andover Fire Department and Public Safety Officer Charles Edgerly of the Andover Police. With input from the neighbors in attendance we discussed the parameters of the study, which will be designed to study both existing conditions as well as the impact of a student population of up to 700 on current school access roads, potential school access roads (Bancroft, West Knoll and Holt), surrounding roads, and intersections. Included in the data the traffic consultants will collect will be police data, accident data, neighbor’s comments, and interviews of staff (such as the crossing guard).
To date we have received a number of emails related to neighborhood traffic concerns; if you have any further concerns, input or specific information for the traffic analysts, please email the SBC (sbc@aps1.net). The traffic consultant will also be attending the School Building Committee meeting for continued discussion on January 13th (see below).
In addition to discussing the traffic analysis, the architect team from SMMA showed the Committee four draft site concepts for a new Bancroft based upon an enrollment of 620 K-5 students and 80 Pre-K students. These draft site concepts showed how a building footprint might look on the site, along with access, parking, and field/play areas. Two of the site concepts showed the footprint in front of the current school, and two of the concepts showed the footprint behind the current school. These concepts were meant as a step in a process for evaluating potential options, and did not represent specific footprint designs from which we must choose. The Committee asked SMMA to bring options at our next meeting (see below) to show site concepts that could be built on the existing footprint.
Upcoming Meetings:
January 6th @ 8:00 am--3rd Floor Conference Room, Old Town Hall
At this meeting we will review the geotechnical consultant proposal as well as additional site concepts
January 13th @ 6:00 pm--School Committee Room, 36R Barltet Street, second floor above the Senior Center
We have scheduled this evening meeting to accommodate those who find it difficult to attend morning meetings. Todd Bryant, the traffic analyst from Bryant Associates, will be in attendance for further discussion of the traffic study. In addition, there will be ample time for community input on the Feasibility Study.
To date we have received a number of emails related to neighborhood traffic concerns; if you have any further concerns, input or specific information for the traffic analysts, please email the SBC (sbc@aps1.net). The traffic consultant will also be attending the School Building Committee meeting for continued discussion on January 13th (see below).
In addition to discussing the traffic analysis, the architect team from SMMA showed the Committee four draft site concepts for a new Bancroft based upon an enrollment of 620 K-5 students and 80 Pre-K students. These draft site concepts showed how a building footprint might look on the site, along with access, parking, and field/play areas. Two of the site concepts showed the footprint in front of the current school, and two of the concepts showed the footprint behind the current school. These concepts were meant as a step in a process for evaluating potential options, and did not represent specific footprint designs from which we must choose. The Committee asked SMMA to bring options at our next meeting (see below) to show site concepts that could be built on the existing footprint.
Upcoming Meetings:
January 6th @ 8:00 am--3rd Floor Conference Room, Old Town Hall
At this meeting we will review the geotechnical consultant proposal as well as additional site concepts
January 13th @ 6:00 pm--School Committee Room, 36R Barltet Street, second floor above the Senior Center
We have scheduled this evening meeting to accommodate those who find it difficult to attend morning meetings. Todd Bryant, the traffic analyst from Bryant Associates, will be in attendance for further discussion of the traffic study. In addition, there will be ample time for community input on the Feasibility Study.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)